Category Archives: equipment

Soldering Irons

BlackJack SolderWerks BK-3000LF


Last spring I had picked up a pair of BlackJack SolderWerks BK3000LF soldering stations with a couple of extra tips in different sizes.  These have worked pretty well for the price (around $39 each at the time) and the control units stack conveniently to save space.  But, they have trouble maintaining temperature when using desoldering braid… or even without using braid, they won’t really maintain temperatures above 360 C.  Also, there aren’t any tips that work well for SMDs.
The price has gone up quite a bit in the past year, so I’d be a lot less inclined to get these now.  The only place to get them, or any tips, appears to be from  If they decide not to carry it, then I’m out of luck for parts.

Hakko FX-951

So, I recently looked at the Hakko units.  The FX-888 is a well made unit (see this hack at the eevBlog), even though it looks a bit like a toy.  I also liked the FX-951, with the digital display.  The 951 series is more of a professional unit, even though it too has the bright yellow and blue colors.  There’s a huge selection of tips, and you can get extra snap-in grips which makes it easier to change the tips while they’re still a bit warm.  The cables on the Hakko are thinner, more flexible, and a bit longer than on the BK-3000LF.

For most purposes, I’d generally go with the FX-888, it’s a great unit at a decent price. Hakko makes a variety of tips available from multiple sellers.

Why two soldering irons?  I found that I often need two sizes during the same work session.  When building a board I’ll use a small bent tip for surface mount devices, and a larger bevel tip for through-hole components and wired connections.  When salvaging a board I often need a small tip to get some components, but for many I need to use a large tip with heavy desoldering braid.  So, having two irons available is very convenient.  And, if they are similar models, I can share the tips between them.


 I have found great prices on tips and handles (and stunningly fast shipping) from

I’ll see about doing a teardown of both the BK-3000LF and the FX-951 when I can.

Voltage References

So, how do you know if your multimeter is giving you the right readings?  The readings might have been correct (within spec) when it was new, but what about 6 months, or 20 years later?  There are a plenty of expensive devices (not to mention calibration services) on the market to check equipment, but what about low-cost/hobbyist level?
Here are a few options from 2 sources:
  has several options, a couple of these are reviewed here:
DMM-Check $35.50
PentaRef $56.00

Geller has two units, the one reviewed here is the SVR and it is readily available.  The other unit,  LNVR, is significantly more expensive and is more of a special order item.
SVR  $39.95
LNVR  – special order

A month ago I had tested all three references and they appeared to be very accurate.  I received a new, calibrated, Agilent 34410A DMM and decided to retest the references.  The SVR and the DMM-Check both appeared to have remained accurate, but the Penta-Ref was a different story.
The Penta-Ref had been quite accurate on 2/21/12, when I checked it with a borrowed calibrated Agilent 34401A.  But, on 3/20 with a new 34410A it seemed off.  The next day I thought about it and checked the two 9-volt batteries which power the Penta-ref… sure enough, they were running a bit low.  With the Penta-ref switched on, the battery voltages were 8.92 and 8.97.  I replaced them with brand new batteries (9.6volts) and re-ran the tests.  That fixed it, the Penta-ref was back on track.

On a similar note, the Geller SVR provided a steady 10.0000 volts output using an input voltage as low as 10.945V.

Geller SVR 23.5° C
Value 34410A Fluke 289
10 Volts 10.0000 10.000

New batteries 22° C Old batteries 23.5° C
Penta-ref Setting 34410A Fluke 289 34410A Fluke 289
0.2500 0.25013 0.25013 0.25426 0.24543
0.4900 0.49007 0.49009 0.49821 0.4983
0.5100 0.51009 .51012 0.51855 0.5186
4.9000 4.9001 4.9004 4.9817 4.982
10.0000 10.0000 10.0001 10.1666 10.167

DMM-Check 23.5° C
Value 34410A Fluke 289
5 Volts 5.0002 5.0006
1 mA 0.99994 1.003
999.4Ω 999.23k 999.3k
9.996kΩ 9.9961k 9.999k
99.97kΩ 99.976k 99.99k


 –  –  UPDATE 4/2/12 –  – 

 I was contacted by Doug Malone of, he noticed this post and felt that the Penta-Ref should not experience a problem with the battery levels that I listed.  He requested that I return it for adjustment/repair.  So, I’ve sent it, and the DMM-Check to Doug for calibration.  I’ll post new results when I get the units back from Doug.

That’s great customer service!

Also, it looks like there’s a new model coming, the DMM-Check Plus.  It will include a 5VAC rms voltage reference,  1mA rms AC current reference, 100Hz precision frequency source, and 0.1%, 10ppm 100OHM precision resistor

 – – UPDATE 4/10/12 – –

I mailed the units back USPS on the evening of 4/3, and received the recalibrated units on Monday 4/9, that was fast!  I let them sit on the bench overnight to acclimatize before testing. 

To test the drop-out voltage on the PentaRef, I temporarily replaced the batteries with 2 isolated bench power supplies.  The PentaRef provided stable accurate output, identical to the battery readings (below) when run at voltages from 9.5V down to 6.5V.  It did not matter if one supply was set at 6.5V and the other at 9.5V, the reference output remained the same.

Test setup:

  • All tests were performed at  21° C. 
  • The Agilent 34410A was set to manual range for each test, with NPLC set to 10, and nulled. 
  • The Fluke 289 was also set to manual ranging and nulled for each test. 
  • One pair of Agilent probes was used for all tests, and was moved between meters for each set of tests.
  • The PentaRef and DMM-Check units were powered by fairly new 9V batteries, providing 9.2V under load.  The Geller SVR was powered by a Rigol 1308A set at 15.00 Volts.
Geller SVR
Value 34410A Fluke 289 notes
10 Volts 10.00005 10.001 within meter’s spec

Setting 34410A Fluke 289 notes
0.2500 0.250036 0.2500 well within device spec of 0.2%
0.4900 0.489981 0.4900 well within device spec of 0.2%
0.5100 0.509995 .5100 within meter’s spec
4.9000 4.89989 4.9001 within meter’s spec
10.0000 9.99986  10.000 within meter’s spec

Value 34410A Fluke 289 notes
5 Volts 4.99994  5.0001 well within device spec of 0.01%
1 mA 0.999923 1.000 well within device spec of 0.1%
999.2Ω 999.231Ω 999.2Ω
9.996kΩ 9.99605k 9.996k
99.97kΩ 99.9746k 99.97k



Based on the results above, all tests fall well within spec.  The Agilent has exceptional accuracy and resolution, and may make it appear the the voltage references aren’t spot on.  But, we have to account for the device’s rated accuracy, compounded by the accuracy of the meter.  So, in these tests, “Within meter’s spec” means that he reading is so close to the specified voltage that I can’t tell if the generated voltage is precisely correct  (Example:  specified value is 0.5100 volts, I measured 0.509995 Volts.  The meter’s accuracy for that reading is +/–  0.000016 volts, so the device may be producing exactly 0.510000 volts, but I can’t be sure).



Rigol PS1308A – Triple Output Power Supply

The Rigol PS1308A is a really nice unit.  Very stable, clean output.  Beautiful user interface, that’s simple and intuitive.  There’s even an ethernet connection with a web interface.  I haven’t tried out the USB connection with LabView yet.
  • 3 output, 80 watt PSU
  • 0 to +6 volts at 0-5 amps
  • 0 to +25 volts at 0-1 amp
  • 0 to -25 volts as 0-1 amp
  • individually switched outputs, and all on/off

Set the desired voltage and the system will display the set point, and the voltage as measured at its outputs.  On the PS1308A, this is just a 2-wire approach, the PS1116 uses a 4-wire setup.

By default, the display shows all 3 outputs at once, but you can zoom/focus on just one.  If I’m just using one output, then I’ll set it to just focus on that.

For a detailed review of these power supplies, see this series of posts from Shahriar at thesignalpath

I’ll see about posting some tests at a variety of loads… not sure when I’ll get to that.


eevBlog µCurrent is here!

Received my µCurrent unit last week, and I finally got around to trying it out.

Nicely made, and performs exactly as described.  But, since it’s from Dave Jones, that’s exactly what I expected.

Dave has provided lots of info about the µCurrent on his site, so I won’t go into the details.  But, I did check the burden voltage:

Range Rating Observed
0 – 300mA 70uV 60uV
0 – 1000uA 10uV 10uV
0 – 1000nA 10uV 10uV

Testing setup:

  • 1.000 on Rigol DP1308A, run through a 1% resistor (different value for each range).
  • voltage drop using BK5491B (50,000 count) DMM.
  • output from µCurrent measured with EX505 (4,000 count) DMM.
  • Temperature 20°C

Procedure: setup for a particular current range, measure voltage with leads connected together(not through the µCurrent), then measure voltage with leads connected through the µCurrent.

Accuracy of µCurrent output:
Checked the accuracy of the current readings from the µCurrent output against the readings from my BK5491B. When using the EX505 to read the uCurrent output, the readings were ±1 of the last digit. When reading the voltage using the BK5491B, the µCurrent output was exactly correct.


Recent Entries »